first of all sory for my bad english so I have been producing and studying for years now and I realized I was making a big mistake when I produce I start looking for something exciting and I try to make what I found more and more exciting but this path does not lead to great results so I realized that to make something even more exciting you have to create a part that is a bit the opposite such as when you want to make something feel big you have to make something small feel first to create contrast and art is contrast.
I have seen that you have asked various musicians about how they play a chord progression using different modes it would be really useful if the various players would give their vision of a b-side that creates contrast but is related it would be something that no vst currently has.
If you can use scaler like this please show me how.
Hmmm, I think this conversation belongs more in “General Discussion” than “Feature Requests”. Scaler can help in making both Exiting and Boring progressions - it’s more of a personal choice than functionality.
My take on the subject is: verse should be less exciting than a chorus. I’m not saying ‘boring’ but just less intense, less stimulating. There is a lot of songs out there lately where everything is a chorus and, frankly speaking, I get easly tired of those as, in a way, all this exitement is flat; there is no cathartic moment that woud give me goose bumps
Yes i absolutely agree with you where everything is a chorus it is very boring to listen.
My idea is to have a tool that for example is next to performances adagio accento which in this case is our most exciting part, the tool goes to creates side b which naturally goes into side a and it would be really useful to have different ways according to different musicians to create our section b which creates contrast and highlights our section a.
Ha ha, I finally got it - I guess I’m not the brightest one in this herd
Having a pattern variation that is geared specifically toward less exiting parts of a song, would be useful to a lot of people. Scaler has those rythm sub-patterns (that are great!) to avoid repetitiveness but, yes, those are variations for one arrangement block. When going to another block, one needs to change a pattern or create own rythm pattern.
Having said that, would I (personally) want such functionality? No . I love Scaler precisely because it doesn’t do everything for me
ARGH!
I have always believed the other way, LOL
well, just these days I was thinking I have to study parts deeper, because so far I always used the single-chord/single pattern ballad workflow
- it’s more of a personal choice than functionality.
. I love Scaler precisely because it doesn’t do everything for me 