Hands down, Scaler is the most advanced program I saw, actually, my mind was blown when Scaler 2 was out and I saw the promotion video. Since then I’m using it for almost a year and I’m frustrated every time I want to compose with it.
If I break it down, I think the chord substitution is the biggest flaw right now. The ability to find substitutes for the chords given is a really basic function, for all users. If they could fix this part, I can take a detour to all the other things that are almost done correctly.
Writing a program is a challenging task for sure, but I think most options the program gives are…really almost there. Some examples:
SYNC- Having the ability to choose which instances I can control will allow me to use this option, but without it, I won’t be able to use it at all, since I have so many parts in my composition… so SYNC is so clever, that with one simple step could turn from unusable to genius.
SOUND PRESET - Why should that area be developed? Scaler controls all of your VST’s, giving you much greater control over the sound. This is such a brilliant feature! By adding more and more sound presets Scaler becomes heavier and heavier, which is a step backward… use your DEV team resources to make the program more usable, not less. Since it’s pretty much easy to do, they could say they added something in the update, but I don’t think it’s a clever thing to do, and I think it’s kind of lazy.
SUBSTITUTIONS OPTIONS - If you right-click on a chord, you’ll find some basic substitution options, but! You can’t hear them, and clicking on them doesn’t seem to put them in the range of your progression, making this option only useful for people who actually know how it will sound, which are people who don’t really need Scaler, making this option truly unusable… with an option to hear the chord before and lock it to the scale this option would be nice. without it, it’s almost better to not have this option at all.
Sound like I’m ranting, but that is not the intention! Since this software is close to being groundbreaking, I’m trying very hard to bring the difficulties I’m experiencing to light.
In general, it seems like the “creative department” brings brilliant ideas, but then the “software development department” just ain’t executing them smartly, they’re missing an option or two.
Hands down, I would pay a lot of money, much more than what it currently costs, if this software would glue everything together. Honestly, I don’t think what I’m suggesting is niche. If they want it to be a “composer tool”, guitarists and pianists’ basic needs are generally similar. The program is currently more based on randomness than focus, but it claims to be focused, and that is the direction it is headed in. Because I know it’s not easy to figure things out, I’m trying to help by “ranting”, I don’t think saying everything is fine will help me save time, or, most importantly, help the developers to make a breakthrough program, even though they are so close…